Lyubichankovsky A.V. The geography of mentality as an ethological geography: subject-object analysis

Authors

  • Lyubichankovsky Alexey Valentinovich Orenburg State University, Department of Geography and regional studies, Orenburg, Russia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-3-3

Keywords:

: geography of mentality, ethological geography, geoethos.

Abstract

In modern social geography, a lacuna of mental-geographical problems is opening, which needs research study. Territorial social systems are inextricably linked with the "mental factor". The article is devoted to the substantiation of a new scientific direction within the framework of social geography, focused on the study of socio-geographical factors and features of the formation, reproduction and transformation of mentality – ethological geography. The task of studying space in mentality, which is important in the socio-geographical plan, is not included in the tasks of ethological geography. Ethological geography expresses the geography of mentality, not mental geography. The problem of mentality in the structure of socio-geographical research suggests the substantiation of ethological geography in the subjectobject context of geographical science: geographical shell, geosystem, cultural landscapes, territorial social systems, etc. Subject-object analysis of ethological geography involves the choice of a basic, key approach that takes into account the specifics of the studied subject of research, based on the proven methodology of social geography. It is shown that such an approach is the concept of the territorial organization of culture and the main regularities of the territorial organization of society. The analysis carried out made it possible to formulate the object and subject of the study of ethological geography. The object of research, on which the research process is directed as a whole, is the spatial structures of ethos. The subject of the study as a reflection of the essential aspects of the object, its detailing in a specific research field is socio-geographical factors and features of the formation, reproduction and transformation of ethos in cultural-territorial communities. Geographical studies of the cultural space of Russia suggest a significant expansion of the subject matter due to theoretical and methodological developments in the geography of mentality, which will make it possible to determine the potential for long-term sustainability of multicultural communities and determine management technologies that can effectively and adequately respond to the rapidly changing political, economic and socio-cultural conjuncture.

Author Biography

  • Lyubichankovsky Alexey Valentinovich, Orenburg State University, Department of Geography and regional studies, Orenburg, Russia

    Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Geography and Regional Studies, Institute of Earth Sciences, Orenburg State University, Orenburg.

References

Анимица Е.Г., Шарыгин М.Д. Социально-экономическая география и региональная экономика: проблемы взаимоотношений // Географический вестник. 2013. № 1. С. 4–12.

Анчел Е. Этос и история. М., 1988. 127 с.

Бакланов П.Я. Об объекте, предмете и задачах современной социально-экономической географии // Социально-экономическая география. Вестн. ассоциации рос. географов-обществоведов. 2014. № 1(9). С. 5.

Голд Дж. Психология и география: Основы поведенческой географии / авт. предисл. С.В. Федулов. М.: Прогресс, 1990. 304 с.

Дружинин А.Г. Теоретические основы географии культуры. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во СКНЦВШ, 1999. 151 с.

Дружинин А.Г., Стрелецкий В.Н. «Культурная составляющая» общественной географии в современной России: генезис, особенности и приоритетные направления развития // Изв. РАН. Сер. геогр.2015. № 1. С. 5–20.

Ефимов В.Т. Этосология как учение о нравах и нравственности. М., 1992. 268 с.

Замятина Н.Ю. Когнитивная география (Материалы к словарю гуманитарной географии) // Гуманитарная география: Научный и культурно-просветительский альманах / сост., отв. ред. Д.Н. Замятин. Вып. 2. М.: Ин-т Наследия, 2005. С. 339–340.

История ментальностей, историческая антропология. Зарубежные исследования в обзорах и рефератах / сост. Е.М. Михина. М., 1996. 255 с.

Лавренова О.А. Перцепционная география (Материалы к словарю гуманитарной географии) // Гуманитарная география. Вып. 5. М.: Ин-т Наследия, 2008. С. 260–264.

Линч К. Образ города / пер. с англ. В.Л. Глазычева; сост. и ред. А.В. Иконников. М.: Стройиздат, 1982. 328 с.

Любичанковский, А.В. Пространственные формы этоса в этологической географии // Социально-экономическая география. Вестн. Ассоциации рос. географов-обществоведов. 2020. № 1 (9). С. 37–49.

Тархов С.А. Социально-экономическая география: ее сущность, предмет изучения и методы // Региональные исследования. 2013. № 3. С. 9–13.

Ткаченко А.А. Некоторые элементы общей теории территориальной организации общества // Социально-экономическая география: традиция и современность / под ред. А.И. Шкириной и В.Е. Шувалова. М. – Смоленск: Ойкумена, 2009. С. 220–222.

Топоров В.Н. Петербург и «Петербург и петербургский текст русской литературы» (Введение в тему) // Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ. Исследования в области мифопоэтического: Избранное. М.: Прогресс-Культура, 1995. С. 214–273.

Философская энциклопедия. Т. 5 / под ред. Ф.В. Константинова. М.: Сов. энциклопедия, 1970. 740 с.

Шарыгин М.Д. Общественная география: контуры будущей науки // Географический вестник. 2014. № 1. C. 20–28.

Adrian H., Pfannschmidt U. Stadt als schone Gestalt. Wachst die Identification der Bewohner, wenn sie schon ist? // Mitt. Dtsch. Acad. Stadtebau und Landesplan. 1987. Vol. 31. № 1.

Board Ch. Maps in the mind's eye: maps on paper and maps in the mind // Progress in Human Geography. 1979. Vol. 3. № 3. P. 434–441. DOI: 10.1177/030913257900300307.

Gould P. On mental maps. Michigan Inter-University Community of Mathematical Geographers. Discussion Paper № 9, 1966.

Gould P. People in information space: The mental maps and information: Surfaces of Sweden // Lund Studies in Geography. Ser. B. Human Geography. No. 42. The Royal University of Lund, 1975. 161 p.

Kitchin R.M. Increasing the integrity of cognitive mapping researh: Appraising conseptual schemata of environment-behavior interaction // Progress in Human Geography. 1996. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 56–84.

Lynch K. Growing up in Cities: Studies of the Spatial Environment of Adolescence in Cracow, Melbourne, Mexico City, Salta, Toluca and Warszawa. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1977. 177 p.

Lynch K. What Time is This Place? Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1971. 288 p.

Mark D.M., Freksa C., Hirtle S.C. Cognitive models of geographical space. Int. J. Geographical Information Science. 1999. Vol. 13. № 8. P. 747–774.

Pocock D. Environmental perception: process and product // Tijdscriftvoor Econ. & Soc. Geografie. 1973. № 64 (4). P. 251–257.

Yi-Fu Tuan Man and Nature// Association of American Geographers. 1971. Resource paper № 10. 49 p.

Yi-Fu Tuan Environmental psychology: a review // Geographical Review. 1972. Vol. 62. № 2. P. 245–256.

Yi-Fu Tuan Space and place: humanistic perspective // Progress in Geography. 1974. Vol. 6. P. 211–252.

Yi-Fu Tuan Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress, 1977. 235 p.

Yi-Fu Tuan Landscape of Fear. N.Y., 1979. 272 p.

Yi-Fu Tuan Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1990. 260 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-28

Issue

Section

Theory of regional studies

How to Cite

Lyubichankovsky A.V. The geography of mentality as an ethological geography: subject-object analysis. (2023). Regional Research, 3 (81), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-3-3