Koshcheev D.A., Isopeskul O.Yu. Functioning of the tourism sector in a pandemic quarantine: problems and solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2021-2-6Keywords:
tourism, tourism sector, COVID-19, pandemic, quarantine, SARS, regional policy, Perm kraiAbstract
The present investigation provides one of the first complex attempts of theorizing on changes in tourism sector activity within COVID-19 quarantine. Drawing from system and criterion approach weusedthe analysis of official documents and news publication to identify 8 international models of tourism sector support within the pandemic quarantine. Each model was considered with the instrument of strengths and weaknesses analysis. By reviewing Russian national model we conducted deeper analyses juxtaposing and describing experience of Russian regions. Drawing from aтopinion poll realized in Perm krai we described some special features of each tourism sector segment activity within COVID-19 pandemic quarantine. The opinion polls mentioned also showed some limitations of Russian tourism sector support model. With regard to the data mentioned, we proposed the concept of the national electronic exchange service of tourism and resort. This system will potentially support the Russian model in the condition of epidemic crisis, helping the national tourism sector to save and then to restore its activity following laissez-faire principle.
References
Гамидова А.Э. Сельский туризм в постпандемийный период // Изв. С.-Петерб. гос. экон. ун-та. 2021. № 1. С. 162–166.
Кощеев Д.А., Исопескуль О.Ю. Понятийно-концептуальный анализ функционирования туристского сектора в условиях глобального эпидемического кризиса // Региональные исследования. 2020. № 4. С. 108–120.
Пшеничных Ю.А. Анализ динамики и тенденций развития современного международного туристского рынка // Вестник университета. 2021. № 1. С. 53–61.
Объявлены даты старта программы по возврату средств за туры по России [Электр.ресурс]. URL: https://tourism.gov.ru/news/16865/ (дата обращения: 27.03.2021).
Совещание о санитарно-эпидемиологической обстановке [Электр. ресурс]. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/63340 (датаобращения: 27.03.2021).
Brouder P. Reset redux: possible evolutionary pathways towards the transformation of tourism in a COVID-19 world //Tourism Geographies. 2020. № 3 (22). P. 484–490.
Buetre B., Kim Y., Tran Q. T., Gunasekera, D. Avian influenza: Potential economic impact of a pandemic on Australia // Australian Commodities: Forecasts and Issues. 2020. № 2 (13). P. 351–359.
Cahyanto I., Wiblishauser M., Pennington-Gray L., Schroeder A. The dynamics of travel avoidance: The case of Ebola in the US // Tourism Management Perspectives. 2020. № 20. P. 195–203.
Cooper J.A., Alderman D.H. Cancelling March Madness exposes opportunities for a more sustainable sports tourism economy //Tourism Geographies. 2020. № 3 (22). P. 525–535.
Hall C.M., Scott D., Gössling S. Pandemics, transformations and tourism: be careful what you wish for // Tourism Geographies. 2020. № 3 (22). P. 577–598.
Henderson J.C., Ng A. Responding to crisis: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and hotels in Singapore // International Journal of Tourism Research. 2004. № 6 (6). P. 411–419.
Kock F., Assaf A.G., Tsionas M. Developing courageous research ideas. // Journal of Travel Research. 2020. № 6 (59). P. 1140–1146.
Kuo H.I., Chen C.C., Tseng W.C., Ju L.F., Huang B.W. Assessing impacts of SARS and Avian Flu on international tourism demand to Asia. // Tourism Management. 2008. № 29 (5). P. 917–928.
Page S., Song H., Wu D.C. Assessing the impacts of the global economic crisis and swine flu on inbound tourism demand in the United Kingdom. // Journal of Travel Research. 2012. № 51 (2). P. 142–153.
Qiu R. T., Park J., Li S., Song H. Social costs of tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic // Annals of Tourism Research. 2020. № 84. P. 102–125.
Shao Y., Hu Z., Luo M., Huo T., Zhao Q. What is the policy focus for tourism recovery after the outbreak of COVID-19? A co-wordanalysis // CurrentIssuesinTourism. 2020. № 3 (27). P. 281–294.
Sigala M. Tourism and COVID-19: impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research // Journal of Business Research. 2020. № 117. P. 312–321.
Welfens P.J. Macroeconomic and health care aspects of the coronavirus epidemic: EU, US and global perspectives // International Economics and Economic Policy. 2020. № 17. P. 295–362.
Zenker S., Kock F. The coronavirus pandemic – A critical discussion of a tourism research agenda // Tourism Management. 2020. № 81. P. 104–164.
2020: Worst Year in Tourism History with 1 Billion Fewer International Arrivals [Электр. ресурс]. URL: https://www.unwto.org/news/2020-worst-year-in-tourism-history-with-1-billion-fewer-international- arrivals (дата обращения: 27.03.2021).
Covid-19: Measures to Support the Travel and Tourism Sector [Электр. ресурс]. URL: https://webunwto. s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2020-06/europe.pdf (датаобращения: 27.03.2021).
Fotiadis A., Polyzos S., Huan T.C.T. The good, the bad and the ugly on COVID-19 tourism recovery] // Annals of Tourism Research. 2021. № 87. 14 p. [Электр. ресурс URL: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC7832145/ (дата обращения: 27.03.2021).
Zhang H., Song H., Wen L., Liu C. Forecasting tourism recovery amid COVID-19 // Annals of Tourism Research. 2021. № 87. 16 p. [Электр. ресурс] URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0160738321000116 (датаобращения: 27.03.2021).
