Alov I.N. Evolution of concepts of spatial segregation in US cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2021-1-9Keywords:
spatial segregation, US cities, concept, methodology, Chicago School, Los Angeles School, polarization, hyperghettoizationAbstract
Spatial segregation has been and still remains a popular object of study among city researchers representing geography, sociology, and economics. The core of the corpus of conceptual works on this subject is composed of works devoted to US cities. Russian and Western European researchers in their works usually either use or criticize the American experience. However, at the moment in the domestic literature there is no comprehensive review of conceptual approaches to the study of the segregation of American cities. Over the almost 100-year history of this direction, theoretical and methodological approaches have changed several times. This article provides a review of thematic literature on American cities over the entire period of study of this phenomenon. There are six main stages in the development of this research field. These include the work of the Chicago School, quantitative studies of segregation as a social problem, original ideas from radical and critical geographers, concepts based on the notion of the racial hierarchy of society, publications of the Los Angeles School and theorists of polarization, as well as the two most recent major concepts. spatial segregation – «quartered city» by P. Marcuse and hyperghettoization by L. Wacquant. The key positions on which the representatives of these directions do not converge are highlighted - the reasons, driving forces and the nature of the segregation process. The logic of the change of prevailing views is traced and conceptual additions are identified.
References
Аксенов К.Э. Социальная сегрегация пространств личной деятельности в посттрансформационномметрополисе (на примере Санкт-Петербурга) // Изв. РГО. 2009. Т. 141. № 1. С. 9–20.
Батуренко С.А. Исследования андеркласса в современном российском обществе: основные методологические подходы // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 18. Социология и политология. 2011. № 1. С. 44–52.
Варшавер Е.А., Рочева А.Л., Иванова Н.С., Ермакова М.А. Места резидентной концентрации мигрантов в российских городах: есть ли паттерн? // Социологическое обозрение. 2020. Т. 19,№ 2. С. 225–253.
Вендина О.И. Социальное расслоение в Москве: цена экономических реформ // Изв. РАН. Сер.геогр. 1996. № 5. С. 63–72.
Вендина О.И. Мигранты в Москве: грозит ли российской столице этническая сегрегация? / Сер. Миграционная ситуация в регионах России. Вып. 3. М.: Центр мигр. исследований, 2005. 88 с.
Куричев Н.К., Куричева Е.К. Пространственная дифференциация активности инорегиональных покупателей на рынке жилья Московского региона // Вестн. РУДН. Сер.: Экономика. 2018. Т. 26.№ 4. С. 643–652.
Махрова А.Г., Голубчиков О.Ю. Российский город в условиях капитализма: социальная трансформация внутригородского пространства // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 5. География. 2012. № 2. С. 26–31.
Мукомель В.И. Миграционная политика России: Постсоветские контексты. М.: Диполь-Т, 2005. 351 с.
Старовойтова Г.В. Этнодисперсная группа в современном советском городе (на материалах татар в Ленинграде) // Этносоциальные проблемы города / под.ред. Ю. Бромлея. М.: Наука, 1986. С. 192–275.
Трущенко О.E. Престиж центра: городская социальная сегрегация в Москве. М.: SocioLogos, 1995. 112 с.
Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать: рождение тюрьмы. Москва: Ад Маргинем, 2018. 416 с.
Berry J.B.L. Geography’s quantitative revolution: initial conditions, 1954–1960. A PersonalMemoir // UrbanGeography. № 14. P. 434–441.
Brelsford C., Martin T., Hand L., Bettencourt L.M.A. Toward cities without slums: Topology and the spatial evolution of neighborhoods // Science Advances. 2018. № 4 (8). P. 18.
Bunge W.W. Racism in geography // The Crisis. 1965. № 72 (8). P. 494–497.
Bunge W.W. Fitzgerald: Geography of a revolution. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, 1971. 272 p.
Burgess E.W. The Growth of the city: an introduction to a research project // Publications of the American Sociological Society. 1924. № 18. P. 85–97.
Burgess E.W. Residential segregation in American cities // The Annals of the American academy of political and social science. 1928. № 140 (1). P. 105–115.
Castells M. European cities, the informational society, and the global economy // Tijdschriftvooreconomische en socialegeografie. 1993. № 84. 247–257.
Castree N. Professionalisation, activism, and the university: whither ‘critical geography’? // Environment and Planning A. 2000. № 32. P. 955–970.
Clark K.B. Dark Ghetto: dilemmas of social power. NewYork: Harper, 1965. 296 p.
Dear M. Los Angeles and the Chicago school: invitation to a debate // City and Community. 2002. № 1. P. 532.
Dear M., Flusty S. Postmodern urbanism // Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1998.№ 88. P. 50–72.
Donaldson F. Geography and the black American: The white papers and the invisible man // Antipode. 1969. № 1 (1). P. 17–33.
Duncan O.D., Duncan B. A Methodological analysis of segregation indices // American Sociological Review. 1955. № 20. P. 210–217.
Flint J. Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes // Urban Studies. 2019. № 56 (1). P. 249–265.
Frey W.H. Diversity explosion: How new racial demographics are remaking America. BrookingsInstitutionPress, 2014. 224 p.
Harvey D.W. Revolutionary and counter revolutionary theory in geography and the problem of ghetto formation // Antipode. 1972. № 4 (2). P. 113.
Harvey D.W. Social justice and the city. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1973. 368 p.
Hoyt H. The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in the United States. Washington, DC: FederalHousingAdministration, 1939. 178 p.
Jackson P. Social geography: race and racism // Progress in Human Geography. 1985. № 10. P. 118–124.
Jackson P., Smith S. (eds.) Social interaction and ethnic segregation. London: AcademicPress, 1981. 235 p.
Kobayashi A. Issues of «Race» and early Radical Geography // Spatial histories of radical geography: North America and Beyond / Barnes T.J., Sheppard E. (eds.). Oxford: JohnWiley&Sons, 2019. P. 39–58.
Lloyd C.D., Shuttleworth I.G., Wong D.W.S. (eds.) Social-Spatial segregation: concepts, processes and outcomes. Bristol: PolicyPress, 2014. 438 p.
Louf R., Barthelemy M. Patterns of residential segregation // PLoS ONE. 2016. № 11 (6). P. 120.
Marcuse P. «Dual City»: a muddy metaphor for a quartered city? // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1989. № 13 (4). P. 697–708.
Marcuse P. The ghetto of exclusion and the fortified enclave // American Behavioral Scientist. 1997.№ 41 (3). P. 311–326.
Massey D.S., Denton N.A. The dimensions of residential segregation // Social Forces. 1988. № 62 (2). P. 281–315.
Massey D.S., Denton N.A. American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: HarvardUniversityPress, 1993. 374 p.
Mollenkopf J., Castells M. (eds.) Dual city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992. 492 p.
Musterd S., Marcińczak S., van Ham M., Tammaru T. Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasingseparationbetweenpoorandrich // UrbanGeography. 2017. № 38 (7). P. 1062– 1083.
Myrdal K.G. An American dilemma: the negro problem and modern democracy. NewYork: Harper&Bros, 1944. 1483 p.
Napierala J., Denton N.A. Measuring residential segregation with the ACS: How the margin of error affects the dissimilarity Index // Demography. 2017. № 54. P. 285–309.
Park R.E., Burgess E.W., McKenzie R.D. The City. University of Chicago Press, 1925. 239 p.
Peake L., Sheppard E. The emergence of Radical/Critical Geography within North America // ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies. 2014. № 13 (2). P. 305–327.
Peet R. Celebrating Thirty years of Radical Geography // Environment and Planning A. 2000. № 32. P. 951–953.
Reardon S.F., Firebaugh G. Measures of multigroup segregation // Sociological Methodology. 2002.№ 32 (1). P. 32–67.
Reardon S.F., O’Sullivan D. Measures of spatial segregation // Sociological Methodology. 2004.
№ 34 (1). P. 121–162.
Rothstein R. The Color of Law: a forgotten history of how our government segregated America. NewYork: Liveright, 2017. 368 p.
Sassen S. Capital mobility and labour migration: their expression in core cities // Urbanization in the World Economy / Timberlake M. (ed.). NewYork: AcademicPress, 1985. 387 p.
Sassen S. The Global city: New York, London and Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991. 397 p.
Smith D.M. Geography and social justice: social justice in a changing World. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1994. 344 p.
Soja E.W. Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 256 p.
Vaughan L., Arbaci S. The Challenges of understanding urban segregation // Built Environment. 2011. № 37 (2). P. 128–138.
Wacquant L. Urban outcasts: a comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: PolityPress, 2008. 360 p.
Wacquant L. Revisiting territories of relegation: Class, ethnicity and state in the making of advanced marginality // Urban Studies. 2016. № 53 (6). P. 1077–1088.
Wiggins B. Calculating race: racial discrimination in risk assessment. OxfordUniversityPress, 2020. 176 p.
Wilson W.J. The declining significance of race: blacks and changing American institutions. UniversityofChicagoPress, 1980. 243 p.
Wilson W.J. The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass and public policy. UniversityofChicagoPress, 1987. 261 p.
Wilson W.J., Wacquant L. The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city // The Ghetto Underclass: Social Science Perspectives / Wilson W.J. (ed.). London: SAGE Publications, 1993. P. 25–42.
Wirth L. The Ghetto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., 1928. 306 p.
